Agentic workflow adoption
Setting up coding agents in a team's workflow: tooling, project context, and a review process built for the volume.
What it costs
- Hourly.
What you get
- Agent tooling configured against your codebase, with context and conventions written where the agent reads them.
- A review process and test coverage sized for code that arrives faster.
- Your team trained on where agents help and where they cost more than they save.
Common questions
Will this replace our developers?
No. It changes what they spend the day doing. Review, architecture and knowing what should be built matter more, not less, when writing the code gets faster.
Which tools do you set up?
Whichever fits your stack and your constraints, including the ones your legal team will accept. We are not resellers and have nothing to gain from the answer.
What if we already tried and it did not stick?
Common. It usually fails on missing context and a review process nobody adjusted, not on the tools. Both are fixable.
Agents already in the codebase?
Get it under controlServices
Legacy migration & modernization
Migrate legacy systems, pay down technical debt, clean up AI-generated code.
Fixed cost. Starts with an audit.Emergency support & rescue
Someone to take it over when a company is already in trouble.
Monthly retainer. No fixed end date.Codebase & infrastructure audit
Find out what you actually own before you commit to changing it.
8,500 CAD / 6,200 USD / 5,300 EUR per week. One to two weeks.Fixed-price projects
Migration, modernization, or a clean build. One number, agreed up front.
Fixed price, fixed cost. Send an RFP.Maintenance contract
Someone on the hook for the system after launch.
Hourly. Three month minimum. No end date.Fractional CTO
Technical direction without a full-time executive hire.
Hourly. No retainer.Full product ownership
One team accountable for the product end to end.
Fixed cost per phase, or hourly.